Skip to main content

Start From Zero? Or From One?

March Against Marx - Part 2

I have no intention of committing silly straw man attacks when I dispute the claims of the Big Man, so I'm going to link to eight important Marxist sources that will inform my understanding of Marxian economics. The ninth and tenth sources are where I'll be getting several of my criticisms from.

Karl Marx was better read as a teenager than I am now, and by the time he'd finished Capital Volume III was an intellectual force of nature. This means my critique must build on the work of economists past and present to have any hope of making a persuasive case.

Also, one vital point. I am not going to debunk Karl Marx's economics. To truly debunk it I would have to demonstrate its total wrongness or non-even-wrongness and either of those ends is beyond my abilities, and probably anybody's. Rather my contention will be that Marxian economics is less good as a way to analyse consumption, distribution and production than Austrian, New Classical & New Institutional economics.

~~~ ~~~ ~~~

Of course we have to have the four main econ volumes from the Big Man himself, Capital Vols I-III and The Value Form, because we need to see Marx's calculations at source to critique them fairly. [1][2][3][4]

~~~ ~~~ ~~~


~~~ ~~~ ~~~


~~~ ~~~ ~~~


~~~ ~~~ ~~~

Two blogs are going to be very important, Kapitalism 101 in favour of Marxian econ and Social Democracy in the 21st Century against. [8][9]

Finally, one big source is that doorstop of a macroeconomics text by Daron Acemoglu called Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. [10]

~~~ ~~~ ~~~

[1] Capital Volume I by Karl Marx from

[2] Capital Volume II " "

[3] Capital Volume III " "

[4] The Value Form by Karl Marx from

[5] The Marxist Theory of Value by TheFinnishBolshevik on Youtube

[6] The Labour Theory of Value by drgerke on Youtube

[7] Econ 305 Marxian Economics Lectures on Youtube

[8] Kapitalism 101 blog maintained by Brendon M Cooney

[9] Social Democracy in the 21st Century blog maintained by LK

[10] Introduction to modern Economic Growth by Daron Acemoglu

Popular posts from this blog

So I was reading a piece on The Outline about identity politics when the author, Sean McElwee, brought up a survey he had penned and collated to establish how positions on economic and racial issues align;
Could Democrats win over racially conservative whites with economic populism? It’s unlikely, because people who oppose racial justice also tend to oppose liberal economic policies.  To test this, I created scales of economic and racial liberalism, using two questions that have been on the American National Election Studies surveys since 1972. One question asks respondents to place themselves on a one-to-seven point scale on government aid to black Americans, the other on a one-to-seven scale on guaranteeing jobs and income for all Americans. In 1972, only 54 percent of white Americans who took the racially liberal position (supporting aid to black Americans) also took the economically liberal position (guaranteeing jobs and income).  By 2016, 74 percent did. And in 1972, 77 perce…

Will Automation Make All of the Jobs Disappear?

... No.

There is no reason to suggest that automation will dramatically increase unemployment in the short term, or at all in the long term.

Seriously, it will not.

Do read the links in the order in which they appear please. Finding the right comments in the third link might be quite interesting. They are all by a user called BestTrousers and start with "RI" meaning R1.

The main argument used by HealthcareEconomist3 is to give a survey of several works, while BestTrousers goes for comparative advantage.

Capital & Labor in the Race to Exploit the Other

The idea that labor exploits capital is equally as plausible, sans assumptions*, as the idea that capital exploits labor. This is only intended as a response to the formal concept, descriptive or normative, of exploitation in Marx's schema from Capital Volume I.

* Assumptions include the power relation whereby capital is just assumed to be above labor hierarchically.

~ Capital exploits labor because... ... Capital earns income from production done by labor that capital didn't perform
~ Labor exploits Capital because... ... Labor earns income from capital that labor didn't buy
Basically in good old formal logic fashion both of those cases above, being factual descriptions, are true at once or are false at once.