Skip to main content

Kapitalism 101's Case(s)


I will post all of Kapitalism 101's major videos here. There are two important playlists from this guy, one explaining the Law of Value and a second taking issue with the so-called Transformation Problem. [1][2]

~~~ ~~~ ~~~

[3]

This one is a long playlist all nicely presented and waiting for you to enjoy, so just clicking the video above or the cite link under it will be sufficient.

~~~ ~~~ ~~~

However, the Transformation Problem Trilogy isn't collected into a playlist by Mr Cooney so I've put all three videos here. Enjoy!




~~~ ~~~ ~~~

[1] Law of Value article at Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_value

[2] Transformation Problem article "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_problem

[3] The Law of Value playlist on Brendan M Cooney's Youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3F695D99C91FC6F7


Popular posts from this blog

So I was reading a piece on The Outline about identity politics when the author, Sean McElwee, brought up a survey he had penned and collated to establish how positions on economic and racial issues align;
Could Democrats win over racially conservative whites with economic populism? It’s unlikely, because people who oppose racial justice also tend to oppose liberal economic policies.  To test this, I created scales of economic and racial liberalism, using two questions that have been on the American National Election Studies surveys since 1972. One question asks respondents to place themselves on a one-to-seven point scale on government aid to black Americans, the other on a one-to-seven scale on guaranteeing jobs and income for all Americans. In 1972, only 54 percent of white Americans who took the racially liberal position (supporting aid to black Americans) also took the economically liberal position (guaranteeing jobs and income).  By 2016, 74 percent did. And in 1972, 77 perce…

What Lingos Are Most Similar to English, Though?

Commentaryism - The Death Toll of Capitalism

How many people have died because capitalism exists? How many would still be alive if it had never existed? Let's dig in!

We will take two approaches over the course of this blog post by looking at the the death tolls attributed to the word in its broad popular definition - everything socialists don't like - versus the toll that fits the definition offered previously on this blog.

By the same token I will not lay any outsized figures at any other mode of production's door except where that mode of production demonstrably caused the problem that killed people. It's political ideologies that really matter here, and this is where the first big problem with even trying to lay a specific body count before capitalism runs into problems - there is no political ideology called capitalism.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now then, Alfonso Gutierrez says in a comment thread that "capitalism and free-markets have murdered billions of people" which is a risky claim at the …