Skip to main content

Survival, Safety, Comfort, Leisure


It strikes me that an easy shorthand for the form of the satisfactions we make goals of may be to rank them in terms of their position, working from mere survival up to totally frivolous leisure.

In our minds we organise our goals according to what might be thought of as a hierarchy of wants. This means that, put simply, we will come up with goals based on the urgency of the thing we want. If the thing and the use of it assures mere survival, and your survival is imperilled, then that use is the one you will choose.

Neoclassical economics employs the concept of utility functions, and Austrian econ the almost identical concept of value scales. The difference is that Austrian value scales are always reckoned to rank preferences ordinally, whereas utility functions can be ordinal or cardinal. Well, some dispute that, but it has held in econ textbooks and, I'm pretty sure, the working behind Principles of Economics by Marshall!

I am not presuming to have my own alternative to either approach. This is supposed to be a kind of supplement. If some day I or somebody else refines it enough that it becomes to economics what Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs is to psychology, then hooray. For now, no such luck.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SURVIVAL
Merely not death. Wants whose satisfaction merely leads to the continuation of organic function.

FOOD
CLOTHING
SHELTER



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SAFETY
Wants whose satisfaction causes a person to feel physically secure both in the moment and contemplating at least their short-term future.

MARTIAL ARTS TRAINING
WEAPONS AND WEAPONS TRAINING
SECURITY SERVICES
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
COMFORT
Physical ease in terms of addressing uncomfortable health problems, enjoying appropriately sized, cut and worked goods, and hygiene of one's person and surroundings.

WHITE GOODS
FURNITURE
ENERGY
HEALTHCARE
HYGIENE



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LEISURE
What it sounds like. Room to breathe! A kinda meta-layer atop the other three taking in flavour, romance and sex, and so on.

SPARE TIME
ENTERTAINMENT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iain McKay, Bryan Caplan & the Case of the "Anarchist" Anarchist

In the past I have written blog posts disputing claims contained in the online document called An Anarchist FAQ principally written by Iain McKay. I spent those posts trying to contend with Iain's claims re  the ancap question  and  the mode of production called capitalism . McKay has a bee in his bonnet re anarcho-capitalists' insistence on referring to themselves as anarchists, that much is obvious. Every reference to ancapism runs something along the lines of "an"cap or "anarcho"-capitalism. I find this very amusing because 'anarchist' or 'anarchism' are words (articulate mouth-sounds) first and specific concepts second.  Ditto 'socialist' and 'socialism' friends. Speaking of socialism... In  the comment section of one of his videos  the Youtuber called StatelessLiberty responded to a criticism by linking to Caplan's work  on the Anarchist adventure in Spain in the 1930's . The critic shot back with a  critic
1 comment
Read more

The 'neoliberal optimism industry' industry

A podcast, Citations Needed , forgot that poverty, violence, hunger and infant mortality are declining and decided that all of the media folk saying positive things about the major trend of our time (modern economic growth) are all wrong. The neoliberal optimism industry is hard at work pushing a cherry-picked slab of bias in our faces and we fellow optimists are all being bamboozled. Of course this is completely wrong, per abundant scholarship and evidence, some even tweeted by Pinker himself on November 24th 2018, four days before this podcast was released. At 05:00 into the podcast they seem to suggest that liberal capitalism = alt-right and fascism! You might wonder why I bother mentioning this since they say they don't take the fish hook theory very seriously themselves. It's because they insist on reading things Pinker isn't saying into Pinker's public statements, so I will work from the assumption that I am supposed to read things these podcasters aren'
Post a Comment
Read more

Doomer Eternal?

Youtuber Sarah Z talks about the Doomers, those who despair of the world. I am not trying to criticize Sarah Z's take since it is remarkably similar to mine, but I will dump my thoughts below anyway. [ 1 ] ~ ~ ~ The media has broadcast nothing but wall-to-wall doom-and-gloom for a-hundred years and then some. If things feel more hopeless now it's because so much of that media is social media generated by us, so that we are sharing the doom-and-gloom meme with each other AS WELL AS getting it from the mainstream media. Human life is in less peril than ever before (barring the possibility of WW3 between China & Russia v. NATO & SEATO) as economic development makes comfortable civilized living more and more accessible to more and more people every year, and the carbon intensity of every unit of GDP is continually declining. CO2 emissions could plausibly lead to specific calamities with identifiable bodycounts in the near future, and preventing CO2 emissions by the one plau
Post a Comment
Read more