Skip to main content

More Freedom, More Jobs...


And just as I was being driven to despair by people spouting 19th Century nonsense about labour markets being oppressive this and impoverishing that, along come Donald J. Boudreaux and Bryan Caplan, with an extra appearance by Don Bellante, to cleanse the palate.

Boudreaux maintains a wonderful blog called Cafe Hayek where he shares what's on his mind re economics and history. Boudreaux is one of two guys who can be found giving academic-level lectures on the most common objections to the existence of the capitalist mode of production.

Between him and Timothy D. Terrell the case in favour is made with reference to such things as the EFW Report, the hockey-stick graph, and the price in terms of work hours of goods and services over the last however many decades.

EFW results showing the superior performance - at least after several decades of consistent application - of less government involvement in trade as opposed to more. A more detailed look at the basis for these graphs can be found here. Image courtesy Wikipedia.

Back to labour markets. The contention by many ridiculous people is that labour markets are examples of so-called buyers' markets, or monopsonies, the mirror image of monopolies. in which the buyer's enjoy some kind of market power. Just look at the unemployment measure above; the correlation between unemployment and economic freedom (free trade, free prices) is negative. More freedom, more jobs.

Don and Bryan agreed that "while there aren’t many upsides to being a low-skilled worker, one upside is that your skills aren’t highly specialized – and, so, you are quite flexible in moving..." between jobs. This makes it unlikely even for low-skilled workers - absent a minimum wage - to spend long periods of time unemployed.

I shall, as a burgeoning econ buff, explore the questions raised by Don Bellante's forebear Joan Robinson re monopsony power and marginal economic exploitation another day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iain McKay, Bryan Caplan & the Case of the "Anarchist" Anarchist

In the past I have written blog posts disputing claims contained in the online document called An Anarchist FAQ principally written by Iain McKay. I spent those posts trying to contend with Iain's claims re  the ancap question  and  the mode of production called capitalism . McKay has a bee in his bonnet re anarcho-capitalists' insistence on referring to themselves as anarchists, that much is obvious. Every reference to ancapism runs something along the lines of "an"cap or "anarcho"-capitalism. I find this very amusing because 'anarchist' or 'anarchism' are words (articulate mouth-sounds) first and specific concepts second.  Ditto 'socialist' and 'socialism' friends. Speaking of socialism... In  the comment section of one of his videos  the Youtuber called StatelessLiberty responded to a criticism by linking to Caplan's work  on the Anarchist adventure in Spain in the 1930's . The critic shot back with a  critic

The 'neoliberal optimism industry' industry

A podcast, Citations Needed , forgot that poverty, violence, hunger and infant mortality are declining and decided that all of the media folk saying positive things about the major trend of our time (modern economic growth) are all wrong. The neoliberal optimism industry is hard at work pushing a cherry-picked slab of bias in our faces and we fellow optimists are all being bamboozled. Of course this is completely wrong, per abundant scholarship and evidence, some even tweeted by Pinker himself on November 24th 2018, four days before this podcast was released. At 05:00 into the podcast they seem to suggest that liberal capitalism = alt-right and fascism! You might wonder why I bother mentioning this since they say they don't take the fish hook theory very seriously themselves. It's because they insist on reading things Pinker isn't saying into Pinker's public statements, so I will work from the assumption that I am supposed to read things these podcasters aren'

Doomer Eternal?

Youtuber Sarah Z talks about the Doomers, those who despair of the world. I am not trying to criticize Sarah Z's take since it is remarkably similar to mine, but I will dump my thoughts below anyway. [ 1 ] ~ ~ ~ The media has broadcast nothing but wall-to-wall doom-and-gloom for a-hundred years and then some. If things feel more hopeless now it's because so much of that media is social media generated by us, so that we are sharing the doom-and-gloom meme with each other AS WELL AS getting it from the mainstream media. Human life is in less peril than ever before (barring the possibility of WW3 between China & Russia v. NATO & SEATO) as economic development makes comfortable civilized living more and more accessible to more and more people every year, and the carbon intensity of every unit of GDP is continually declining. CO2 emissions could plausibly lead to specific calamities with identifiable bodycounts in the near future, and preventing CO2 emissions by the one plau