Skip to main content

Using Capitalism to Save Yourself From Communism


Today I learned that the Oneida silverware-making company has a fascinating origin story. The company offers high-quality silverware and has been in business for a long time dating back to 1880. [1][2] Why that year? Because that's around the time that the Oneida Community dissolved. [3][4]

Thanks to David Friedman in an interview for the Voluntary Virtues Network I am now aware of this. [5]
The law between me and you is
The same as the law between you and me
And we may disagree as to what the law should be
But what's the big deal? Basically the Oneida Community was a commune organised on a basis of free love, with up to 300 members. All production and distribution by and between the commune members was handled by 27 standing committees and .

John Humphrey Noyes' belief in the doctrine of perfectionism found expression in the community, where every man was the husband of every woman, and every woman was the wife of every man. This is a very literal interpretation of what any form of communism ultimately aspires to, extending the family to encompass the whole community. Many were the quirks of this community from their practise of complex marriage, mutual criticism and stirpiculture.

Indeed they were referred to as Bible communists, though what they practised wasn't quite communism as we would understand the word today because they continued to trade with the outside world in goods and money, so while money was considered of no importance internally, externally it still offered to the means to purchase food and hire external labourers.

What did the community produce? Why, silverware, of course! Well, actually not so much. Silverware production only seems to have become a money-spinner towards the end of the commune's life. The big thing for much of the commune's life was steel traps of a new design whose inventor had joined the commune, giving the an edge in the marketplace for steel traps.

The Britannica has this to say on the decline of the commune;
Hostility mounted in the surrounding communities to the Perfectionists’ marriage arrangements, and in 1879 Noyes advised the group to abandon the system. As the reorganization of the community began, the entire Socialist organization of property in Oneida also was questioned. Noyes and a few adherents went to Canada, where he died in 1886. The remaining members set up a joint stock company, known as Oneida Community, Ltd. which carried on the various industries, particularly the manufacture of silver plate, as a commercial enterprise.

As Friedman points out in the video interview, the folks in charge of the reorganisation made sure that the revenues from the new business paid for the retirement of community members who had amassed no savings over their working lives in this commune.

The result, considering the quality of the steel traps and silverware produced by the guys and gals at Oneida, was that the remaining members actually flourished like never before. In this way a transition to capitalism saved people from their own adventure in partial communism.

~~~ ~~~ ~~~

[1] Oneida Limited customer-facing website
http://www.oneida.com/

[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Limited

[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Community

[4]
http://www.britannica.com/topic/Oneida-Community

[5] Mike Shanklin interviewing David Friedman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm6232vqVz0

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iain McKay, Bryan Caplan & the Case of the "Anarchist" Anarchist

In the past I have written blog posts disputing claims contained in the online document called An Anarchist FAQ principally written by Iain McKay. I spent those posts trying to contend with Iain's claims re  the ancap question  and  the mode of production called capitalism . McKay has a bee in his bonnet re anarcho-capitalists' insistence on referring to themselves as anarchists, that much is obvious. Every reference to ancapism runs something along the lines of "an"cap or "anarcho"-capitalism. I find this very amusing because 'anarchist' or 'anarchism' are words (articulate mouth-sounds) first and specific concepts second.  Ditto 'socialist' and 'socialism' friends. Speaking of socialism... In  the comment section of one of his videos  the Youtuber called StatelessLiberty responded to a criticism by linking to Caplan's work  on the Anarchist adventure in Spain in the 1930's . The critic shot back with a  critic

The 'neoliberal optimism industry' industry

A podcast, Citations Needed , forgot that poverty, violence, hunger and infant mortality are declining and decided that all of the media folk saying positive things about the major trend of our time (modern economic growth) are all wrong. The neoliberal optimism industry is hard at work pushing a cherry-picked slab of bias in our faces and we fellow optimists are all being bamboozled. Of course this is completely wrong, per abundant scholarship and evidence, some even tweeted by Pinker himself on November 24th 2018, four days before this podcast was released. At 05:00 into the podcast they seem to suggest that liberal capitalism = alt-right and fascism! You might wonder why I bother mentioning this since they say they don't take the fish hook theory very seriously themselves. It's because they insist on reading things Pinker isn't saying into Pinker's public statements, so I will work from the assumption that I am supposed to read things these podcasters aren'

Doomer Eternal?

Youtuber Sarah Z talks about the Doomers, those who despair of the world. I am not trying to criticize Sarah Z's take since it is remarkably similar to mine, but I will dump my thoughts below anyway. [ 1 ] ~ ~ ~ The media has broadcast nothing but wall-to-wall doom-and-gloom for a-hundred years and then some. If things feel more hopeless now it's because so much of that media is social media generated by us, so that we are sharing the doom-and-gloom meme with each other AS WELL AS getting it from the mainstream media. Human life is in less peril than ever before (barring the possibility of WW3 between China & Russia v. NATO & SEATO) as economic development makes comfortable civilized living more and more accessible to more and more people every year, and the carbon intensity of every unit of GDP is continually declining. CO2 emissions could plausibly lead to specific calamities with identifiable bodycounts in the near future, and preventing CO2 emissions by the one plau