Skip to main content

Peak Stuff? Really?


I just saw a BBC News interview where the anchor asked an economist of Pantheon Macroeconomics whether recent sales data indicated that we had reached 'peak stuff' yet. [1][2]

A sort of anchor piece at the Guardian website offers a brief overview as of late 2011 of this idea of peak stuff with some data on what's going on. [3] More recently Ikea's sustainability officer said similar things. [4] If one wants the wiki experience while reading about this tripe one can try the P2P Foundation. [5]

One thing that caught in my craw about the interview - and about discussion of the latest Guardian story online - was that the question included the economic fallacy of planned obsolescence. [6]

But going back to the Guardian overview from 2011, one sees that it's all about just raw quantities of stuff, not economic growth. Tonnage of household waste, food and fertiliser, cement, paper, water, and energy usage are the main contenders. The other example was total car purchases. The author is quite interesting on the why of dwindling auto sales;
I suspect dwindling vehicle sales are being driven by lots of factors working in parallel. These might include our increasingly urbanised population, better car design meaning that each vehicle stays on the road for longer, the birth of car clubs, and the fact that we only have a certain amount of road and parking space.
Quite interesting that in there the author basically admits that the longevity of automobiles has only increased, which brings up a massive sore point of mine re the interview. That is that, carrying on from a few paragraphs up, planned obsolescence is not a quantity in real life product design and never has been. [7]

The fact that the folks writing at a major newspaper and in the alt-econ blogosphere don't actually know what economic growth is doesn't surprise me but it's always disheartening to encounter their ignorance time after time.

Economic growth and increasing quantities of stuff used are not the same thing. Economic growth comes from increases in the value-added from exchange over time. That's it. Love ya, learn econ.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[1]
http://makewealthhistory.org/2011/11/14/has-britain-experienced-peak-stuff/

[2]
http://makewealthhistory.org/2016/01/20/did-ikea-just-admit-to-peak-stuff/

[3]
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2011/nov/01/peak-stuff-consumption-data

[4]
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jan/18/weve-hit-peak-home-furnishings-says-ikea-boss-consumerism?CMP=fb_gu

[5]
http://p2pfoundation.net/Peak_Stuff

[6]
http://vote-2012.proboards.com/thread/6773/peak-stuff-big-business-starting

[7]
http://ecomonyblogtime.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/built-in-obsolescence.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iain McKay, Bryan Caplan & the Case of the "Anarchist" Anarchist

In the past I have written blog posts disputing claims contained in the online document called An Anarchist FAQ principally written by Iain McKay. I spent those posts trying to contend with Iain's claims re  the ancap question  and  the mode of production called capitalism . McKay has a bee in his bonnet re anarcho-capitalists' insistence on referring to themselves as anarchists, that much is obvious. Every reference to ancapism runs something along the lines of "an"cap or "anarcho"-capitalism. I find this very amusing because 'anarchist' or 'anarchism' are words (articulate mouth-sounds) first and specific concepts second.  Ditto 'socialist' and 'socialism' friends. Speaking of socialism... In  the comment section of one of his videos  the Youtuber called StatelessLiberty responded to a criticism by linking to Caplan's work  on the Anarchist adventure in Spain in the 1930's . The critic shot back with a  critic...
1 comment
Read more

Commentaryism - The Death Toll of Capitalism

How many people have died because capitalism exists? How many would still be alive if it had never existed? Let's dig in! We will take two approaches over the course of this blog post by looking at the the death tolls attributed to the word in its broad popular definition - everything socialists don't like - versus the toll that fits the definition offered previously on this blog. By the same token I will not lay any outsized figures at any other mode of production's door except where that mode of production demonstrably caused the problem that killed people. It's political ideologies that really matter here, and this is where the first big problem with even trying to lay a specific body count before capitalism runs into problems - there is no political ideology called capitalism. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Now then, Alfonso Gutierrez says  in a comment thread that "capitalism and free-markets have murdered billions of people" which is a risky cla...
Post a Comment
Read more

Zeitardation

A Youtuber called axe863 made a video in which he used scientific, mathematical and statistical common-sense to deliver the KO that the Venus Project and Zeitgeist Movement so richly deserved. If his approach seems weird and unconventional it's because he's not attacking from a tradition neoclassical or Keynesian perspective. Axe863's poison is complexity economics, something a good deal more dangerous to ideas like TVP and TZM. [ 2 ] Now to a couple of comment threads from below the video that I thought could od with being replicated just in case they get deleted at source! ~~~ AstralLuminary 1 year ago Why can't we generalize the consumption patterns of middle-income people in the western world, set our constraints equal to the amount of localized resources, and the rate of resource recovery, derive a population growth model that would be sustainable to said consumption patterns, and derive the necessary quantifiable amount of work required to expen...
Post a Comment
Read more