Skip to main content

Thoughts...


To me a recent discussion I got into raises some questions that might make a nifty study to undertake. Such a study might ask;


  • What share of the populations of what developing countries work either making things that are exported to the developed world or are employed by developed world companies?
  • What alternatives to this work are available?
  • Are the old ways pre-employment still available?
  • Over what time scale have people's material circumstances changed?
  • How have those circumstances changed?
  • And what are the likely future trends for such people?


Those are crucial questions in identifying who is living under what circumstances and to correctly identify the reasons for those circumstances. But since a £40k grant from a major university hasn't just fallen into my lap I ain't going to be doing any such thing.



DEATH

Some basis for claims about how many people die worldwide for what reasons every year;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_causes_of_death_by_rate

A graphical breakdown of total 20th Century mortality by cause;
http://infobeautiful3.s3.amazonaws.com/2013/03/iib_death_wellcome_collection_fullsize.png

I don't see where the correlation between large numbers of annual human deaths on Earth and the existence of capitalism rests. Everywhere it's been tried there is a weak correlation but it's negative - that is capitalistic places see less death, at least after a few decades' worth of economic development off the back of that same capitalism;



SPREADSHEET LIVING

Humans are heterogeneous, human actions are heterogeneous, and land and capital are heterogeneous.

Therefore totting up quantities of stuff - and of, say, people in poverty or numbers of people who die of starvation per year - that exist on Earth and saying one of these aggregates can alleviate the other does not represent the real-world challenges of implementing such a solution - otherwise central planning would work.

Otherwise such things would have been solved by charitable giving and government foreign aid by now.



POVERTY

A report on the effects of Zimbabwe's socialist land reforms on agricultural productivity - that is, actual production of food that humans can eat. One of the sub-articles deals with the on-the-ground consequences for food production and mass starvation of imposing a commons in land;
http://www.cgdev.org/page/scorched-earth-zimbabwe-and-after-satellite-photos

A fabulous news story elucidating the same point as the link just above;
http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/news/zimsit_agriculture-tale-zimbabwes-sleeping-giant/

Poverty rate lower than ever because of capitalism, including in Africa - will be extinct in 25 years tops absent WW3;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/10/05/for-the-first-time-less-than-10-percent-of-the-world-is-living-in-extreme-poverty-world-bank-says/

Dambisa Moyo explains why government to government aid is a non-starter - points out that $1 trillion has been spent on it to no long-term positive effect at all;
http://dambisamoyo.com/publications-articles-videos/books/dead-aid/
http://www.cfr.org/world/aid-dead-discussion-dambisa-moyo-foreign-aid-development/p34548



ESCAPE

M-PESA offers an easy way for farmers in Kenya & Tanzania to get access to credit to improve their farms through eg. fertilisers and machinery;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-Pesa

The European Union Common Agricultural Policy is one of the biggest obstacles to more productive agriculture in Africa;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Agricultural_Policy#Anti-development

Clearly any attempt to turn the continent into a commons ain't going to work QED Zimbabwe farming commons;
http://www.cgdev.org/page/scorched-earth-zimbabwe-and-after-satellite-photos

Africans are not somehow magically different from other people. They will escape poverty in their own ways ('their own ways' meaning each person will find their own way) and the best thing an outsider can do is;
a. let them by leaving them alone
b. donate to a charity that doesn't interact with Western or African governments
c. invest in African enterprise



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Zeitardation

A Youtuber called axe863 made a video in which he used scientific, mathematical and statistical common-sense to deliver the KO that the Venus Project and Zeitgeist Movement so richly deserved. If his approach seems weird and unconventional it's because he's not attacking from a tradition neoclassical or Keynesian perspective. Axe863's poison is complexity economics, something a good deal more dangerous to ideas like TVP and TZM. [ 2 ] Now to a couple of comment threads from below the video that I thought could od with being replicated just in case they get deleted at source! ~~~ AstralLuminary 1 year ago Why can't we generalize the consumption patterns of middle-income people in the western world, set our constraints equal to the amount of localized resources, and the rate of resource recovery, derive a population growth model that would be sustainable to said consumption patterns, and derive the necessary quantifiable amount of work required to expen...

World Hunger - Getting Better or Worse?

Thinking about how rates of hunger have shifted over the last 25 years led me to the Global Hunger Index , which covers - wait for it - the last 25 years. What do we see by looking at their figures for hunger in different countries in the years for which data are available? The Global Hunger Index uses aggregated statistics to arrive at a 'score' for every country studied in a given year with 0 the ideal and 50+ an absolute nightmare of near famine-level proportions. If you were switched-on enough to follow the link above you probably noticed it includes an interactive world map showing the change in rates of hunger for folks in many countries that might best be described as low-income or middle-income. An illustration of the score system is just below. And just in case it wasn't already obvious that everything is getting better, here is the data for all of the individual countries measured on a scatter plot in terms of their reduction in GHI score from 2000...

Commentaryism - The Death Toll of Capitalism

How many people have died because capitalism exists? How many would still be alive if it had never existed? Let's dig in! We will take two approaches over the course of this blog post by looking at the the death tolls attributed to the word in its broad popular definition - everything socialists don't like - versus the toll that fits the definition offered previously on this blog. By the same token I will not lay any outsized figures at any other mode of production's door except where that mode of production demonstrably caused the problem that killed people. It's political ideologies that really matter here, and this is where the first big problem with even trying to lay a specific body count before capitalism runs into problems - there is no political ideology called capitalism. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Now then, Alfonso Gutierrez says  in a comment thread that "capitalism and free-markets have murdered billions of people" which is a risky cla...