Skip to main content

Masticating on McKay Part One - Limited Liability


As all three of you know Iain McKay, librarian of the workers' revolution and keeper of the one truth, is my favourite person ever.

Several of his pieces are published on libcom.org so I couldn't help but browse. This will be a series with this top bit repeated through each post. Sorry for that. I'm unresponsive to my public :p

~~~

In a piece called The Grand Bluff: Private profits, social risks our truth-teller gives a quick history of limited liability and why it's a bad thing; namely that it decreases owners' exposure to the risks the businesses they own take on.

Correct! Limited liability is one state-granted monopoly privilege (along with organisational legal personhood, patents, and copyrights) that pretty much all anti-statists oppose. By describing the situation from the perspective of risk McKay even gets the reason why it's economically problematic right.

Inevitably, however, there are some things I must complain about; there wouldn't be any point doing this if I didn't have a few pennies to toss in the well...

First is the fact that the chance of gain is not "unlimited", as a quick perusal of business failure rates will make clear. [2]

Next is the obscene generalisation that "Capitalism has developed precisely by externalising risk and placing the burden onto..., ultimately, society as a whole" when discussing, specifically, the finance industry. The construction, tech, security, entertainment or energy industries are not party to any of this - well, maybe construction indirectly, but even then that's two industries out of thousands. [3]

My third and final contention is that a government bailout, while it represents government shielding certain people against the risks they face, is not a necessary outgrowth of limited liability, otherwise why didn't Iceland's government bailout its stricken banks? In Iceland, the banks went out of business and that was that.

In the overwhelming majority of countries in the world the kind of government activism exercised in 2008 to 2009 is not generally seen even in finance, and is certainly more-or-less unheard of in any other industries. [4]

Judging by the example of Iceland, allowing the banks to go out of business didn't lead to anarcho-socialism anyway, but rather just a sturdier financial system. In the UK it was Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds, HBOS and Northern Rock that were brought low, whereas Barclays and HSBC were by and large unexposed and never required any government assistance. Between them these two, Santander, and a few up-and-coming smaller banks could have taken on all the customers of the stricken UK banks without much incident. [5]

P.S

The article seems to confuse Limited Liability Partnerships (LLP) and Limited Liability Companies (Ltd), though this criticism may be unwarranted as McKay might only be talking about the businesses that offer sstock market services, which are mostly LLPs

~~~

[1]
http://libcom.org/library/grand-bluff-private-profits-social-risks

[2]
http://www.statisticbrain.com/startup-failure-by-industry/

[3]
http://www.freetheworld.com/2015/economic-freedom-of-the-world-2015.pdf

[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932011_Icelandic_financial_crisis

[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_United_Kingdom_bank_rescue_package#Participating_banks

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeitardation

A Youtuber called axe863 made a video in which he used scientific, mathematical and statistical common-sense to deliver the KO that the Venus Project and Zeitgeist Movement so richly deserved. If his approach seems weird and unconventional it's because he's not attacking from a tradition neoclassical or Keynesian perspective. Axe863's poison is complexity economics, something a good deal more dangerous to ideas like TVP and TZM. [ 2 ] Now to a couple of comment threads from below the video that I thought could od with being replicated just in case they get deleted at source! ~~~ AstralLuminary 1 year ago Why can't we generalize the consumption patterns of middle-income people in the western world, set our constraints equal to the amount of localized resources, and the rate of resource recovery, derive a population growth model that would be sustainable to said consumption patterns, and derive the necessary quantifiable amount of work required to expen...
Post a Comment
Read more

World Hunger - Getting Better or Worse?

Thinking about how rates of hunger have shifted over the last 25 years led me to the Global Hunger Index , which covers - wait for it - the last 25 years. What do we see by looking at their figures for hunger in different countries in the years for which data are available? The Global Hunger Index uses aggregated statistics to arrive at a 'score' for every country studied in a given year with 0 the ideal and 50+ an absolute nightmare of near famine-level proportions. If you were switched-on enough to follow the link above you probably noticed it includes an interactive world map showing the change in rates of hunger for folks in many countries that might best be described as low-income or middle-income. An illustration of the score system is just below. And just in case it wasn't already obvious that everything is getting better, here is the data for all of the individual countries measured on a scatter plot in terms of their reduction in GHI score from 2000...
Post a Comment
Read more

Commentaryism - The Death Toll of Capitalism

How many people have died because capitalism exists? How many would still be alive if it had never existed? Let's dig in! We will take two approaches over the course of this blog post by looking at the the death tolls attributed to the word in its broad popular definition - everything socialists don't like - versus the toll that fits the definition offered previously on this blog. By the same token I will not lay any outsized figures at any other mode of production's door except where that mode of production demonstrably caused the problem that killed people. It's political ideologies that really matter here, and this is where the first big problem with even trying to lay a specific body count before capitalism runs into problems - there is no political ideology called capitalism. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Now then, Alfonso Gutierrez says  in a comment thread that "capitalism and free-markets have murdered billions of people" which is a risky cla...
Post a Comment
Read more