Skip to main content

Using Capitalism to Save Yourself From Communism


Today I learned that the Oneida silverware-making company has a fascinating origin story. The company offers high-quality silverware and has been in business for a long time dating back to 1880. [1][2] Why that year? Because that's around the time that the Oneida Community dissolved. [3][4]

Thanks to David Friedman in an interview for the Voluntary Virtues Network I am now aware of this. [5]
The law between me and you is
The same as the law between you and me
And we may disagree as to what the law should be
But what's the big deal? Basically the Oneida Community was a commune organised on a basis of free love, with up to 300 members. All production and distribution by and between the commune members was handled by 27 standing committees and .

John Humphrey Noyes' belief in the doctrine of perfectionism found expression in the community, where every man was the husband of every woman, and every woman was the wife of every man. This is a very literal interpretation of what any form of communism ultimately aspires to, extending the family to encompass the whole community. Many were the quirks of this community from their practise of complex marriage, mutual criticism and stirpiculture.

Indeed they were referred to as Bible communists, though what they practised wasn't quite communism as we would understand the word today because they continued to trade with the outside world in goods and money, so while money was considered of no importance internally, externally it still offered to the means to purchase food and hire external labourers.

What did the community produce? Why, silverware, of course! Well, actually not so much. Silverware production only seems to have become a money-spinner towards the end of the commune's life. The big thing for much of the commune's life was steel traps of a new design whose inventor had joined the commune, giving the an edge in the marketplace for steel traps.

The Britannica has this to say on the decline of the commune;
Hostility mounted in the surrounding communities to the Perfectionists’ marriage arrangements, and in 1879 Noyes advised the group to abandon the system. As the reorganization of the community began, the entire Socialist organization of property in Oneida also was questioned. Noyes and a few adherents went to Canada, where he died in 1886. The remaining members set up a joint stock company, known as Oneida Community, Ltd. which carried on the various industries, particularly the manufacture of silver plate, as a commercial enterprise.

As Friedman points out in the video interview, the folks in charge of the reorganisation made sure that the revenues from the new business paid for the retirement of community members who had amassed no savings over their working lives in this commune.

The result, considering the quality of the steel traps and silverware produced by the guys and gals at Oneida, was that the remaining members actually flourished like never before. In this way a transition to capitalism saved people from their own adventure in partial communism.

~~~ ~~~ ~~~

[1] Oneida Limited customer-facing website
http://www.oneida.com/

[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Limited

[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Community

[4]
http://www.britannica.com/topic/Oneida-Community

[5] Mike Shanklin interviewing David Friedman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm6232vqVz0

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Zeitardation

A Youtuber called axe863 made a video in which he used scientific, mathematical and statistical common-sense to deliver the KO that the Venus Project and Zeitgeist Movement so richly deserved. If his approach seems weird and unconventional it's because he's not attacking from a tradition neoclassical or Keynesian perspective. Axe863's poison is complexity economics, something a good deal more dangerous to ideas like TVP and TZM. [ 2 ] Now to a couple of comment threads from below the video that I thought could od with being replicated just in case they get deleted at source! ~~~ AstralLuminary 1 year ago Why can't we generalize the consumption patterns of middle-income people in the western world, set our constraints equal to the amount of localized resources, and the rate of resource recovery, derive a population growth model that would be sustainable to said consumption patterns, and derive the necessary quantifiable amount of work required to expen...

World Hunger - Getting Better or Worse?

Thinking about how rates of hunger have shifted over the last 25 years led me to the Global Hunger Index , which covers - wait for it - the last 25 years. What do we see by looking at their figures for hunger in different countries in the years for which data are available? The Global Hunger Index uses aggregated statistics to arrive at a 'score' for every country studied in a given year with 0 the ideal and 50+ an absolute nightmare of near famine-level proportions. If you were switched-on enough to follow the link above you probably noticed it includes an interactive world map showing the change in rates of hunger for folks in many countries that might best be described as low-income or middle-income. An illustration of the score system is just below. And just in case it wasn't already obvious that everything is getting better, here is the data for all of the individual countries measured on a scatter plot in terms of their reduction in GHI score from 2000...

Commentaryism - The Death Toll of Capitalism

How many people have died because capitalism exists? How many would still be alive if it had never existed? Let's dig in! We will take two approaches over the course of this blog post by looking at the the death tolls attributed to the word in its broad popular definition - everything socialists don't like - versus the toll that fits the definition offered previously on this blog. By the same token I will not lay any outsized figures at any other mode of production's door except where that mode of production demonstrably caused the problem that killed people. It's political ideologies that really matter here, and this is where the first big problem with even trying to lay a specific body count before capitalism runs into problems - there is no political ideology called capitalism. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Now then, Alfonso Gutierrez says  in a comment thread that "capitalism and free-markets have murdered billions of people" which is a risky cla...