Today I learned that the Oneida silverware-making company has a fascinating origin story. The company offers high-quality silverware and has been in business for a long time dating back to 1880. [1][2] Why that year? Because that's around the time that the Oneida Community dissolved. [3][4]
Thanks to David Friedman in an interview for the Voluntary Virtues Network I am now aware of this. [5]
The law between me and you isBut what's the big deal? Basically the Oneida Community was a commune organised on a basis of free love, with up to 300 members. All production and distribution by and between the commune members was handled by 27 standing committees and .
The same as the law between you and me
And we may disagree as to what the law should be
John Humphrey Noyes' belief in the doctrine of perfectionism found expression in the community, where every man was the husband of every woman, and every woman was the wife of every man. This is a very literal interpretation of what any form of communism ultimately aspires to, extending the family to encompass the whole community. Many were the quirks of this community from their practise of complex marriage, mutual criticism and stirpiculture.
Indeed they were referred to as Bible communists, though what they practised wasn't quite communism as we would understand the word today because they continued to trade with the outside world in goods and money, so while money was considered of no importance internally, externally it still offered to the means to purchase food and hire external labourers.
What did the community produce? Why, silverware, of course! Well, actually not so much. Silverware production only seems to have become a money-spinner towards the end of the commune's life. The big thing for much of the commune's life was steel traps of a new design whose inventor had joined the commune, giving the an edge in the marketplace for steel traps.
The Britannica has this to say on the decline of the commune;
Hostility mounted in the surrounding communities to the Perfectionists’ marriage arrangements, and in 1879 Noyes advised the group to abandon the system. As the reorganization of the community began, the entire Socialist organization of property in Oneida also was questioned. Noyes and a few adherents went to Canada, where he died in 1886. The remaining members set up a joint stock company, known as Oneida Community, Ltd. which carried on the various industries, particularly the manufacture of silver plate, as a commercial enterprise.
As Friedman points out in the video interview, the folks in charge of the reorganisation made sure that the revenues from the new business paid for the retirement of community members who had amassed no savings over their working lives in this commune.
The result, considering the quality of the steel traps and silverware produced by the guys and gals at Oneida, was that the remaining members actually flourished like never before. In this way a transition to capitalism saved people from their own adventure in partial communism.
~~~ ~~~ ~~~
[1] Oneida Limited customer-facing website
http://www.oneida.com/
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Limited
[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Community
[4]
http://www.britannica.com/topic/Oneida-Community
[5] Mike Shanklin interviewing David Friedman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm6232vqVz0
Comments
Post a Comment