I reserve the right to be wrong.
David D. Friedman and Robert P. Murphy debate the efficacy of the Chicago vs. Austrian schools of economics.
I sympathise with the Austrian School and not the Chicago one. There is an exception, though, namely Public Choice Theory. This Chicago School theory takes in the study of rent-seeking in the public sector, as opposed to the usual point of economics, which tends to study the profit-seeking behaviour of people in the private sector, and doesn't really study government in detail.
But that's another story.
On the next Ecomony Blogtime; why can't fusion reactors consist of solar panels facing inwards toward the plasma? Is that not a way to produce electricity that can be stored or sold onto the grid?
David D. Friedman and Robert P. Murphy debate the efficacy of the Chicago vs. Austrian schools of economics.
I sympathise with the Austrian School and not the Chicago one. There is an exception, though, namely Public Choice Theory. This Chicago School theory takes in the study of rent-seeking in the public sector, as opposed to the usual point of economics, which tends to study the profit-seeking behaviour of people in the private sector, and doesn't really study government in detail.
But that's another story.
On the next Ecomony Blogtime; why can't fusion reactors consist of solar panels facing inwards toward the plasma? Is that not a way to produce electricity that can be stored or sold onto the grid?
Comments
Post a Comment